The New York Times v. Sullivan set the standard for libel
cases in the United States. This case
made it where libel can only exist if the publisher knowingly publishes false
information with intent to harm or negligently publishes information.
This supports the first amendment. This meant that simple mistakes or misguided
statements wouldn’t bankrupt newspapers.
This protected the newspapers from publishing verified information that
later might prove differently.
This landmark decision only makes common sense. If a person makes a statement against a
public entity and it isn’t meant to be negative, then why should they be able
to sue? They shouldn’t. No harm was done. No harm was meant to be done. Had this decision not happened, then
essentially a person can sue another person just for talking about them.
No comments:
Post a Comment